Future of War

Hyper-aggressive wars and conflicts- that is those not waged directly in defence of a nation or region, cause massive destruction to human life and its environment as well as the lives of future generations.
Therefore it is morally incumbent on all governments and populations to avoid or minimise the horrendous social and economic consequences involved.

In addition, wars are not only destructively immoral in terms of life and property but also illegal under National and International law. At the Nuremberg trials following the defeat of Nazi Germany, aggressive wars were judged to constitute the worst of international crimes, with prevention the major reason for founding the United Nations.

Methods for managing such conflicts and avoiding escalation of violence between major powers have been greatly bolstered since the end of WW2, with the creation of institutions such as the UN, NATO and the EU. In addition, new methods of mediation and diplomacy have gradually evolved in which third party nations and groups are involved in the resolution and management of conflict and peacekeeping processes. Although these methods are far from perfect, there are grounds for optimism that over time, combined with increasing globalisation ensuring the intermeshing of all national interests and cultures, major conflicts between and within States will become impossible to sustain.

Post cold war there have been numerous civil and neighbouring national conflicts, often involving ethnic or separatist groups, creating great suffering and subsequent large flows of refugees. However there is room for optimisim as a study of wars and armed conflict, The Human Security Report: War and Peace in the 21st Century, shows that the number of armed conflicts has fallen by 40% since the end of the Cold War.

Also since its establishment, the UN has played a significant role as effective peacemaker, with a positive outcome achieved in 66% of peace missions. There has also been a sixfold increase in UN efforts to prevent wars from starting, a fourfold increase in UN peacemaking missions to end unresolved conflicts and an elevenfold increase in the number of states made subject to UN sanctions.

A variety of techniques from mediation and peace-keeping to trade sanctions and threat of reprisal, are being applied in order to force warring parties to the peace table. These have been applied with mixed success in Bosnia, Kosovo, Kashmir, Northern Ireland and the Sudan, with Burma a recent success, while high-pressure mediation is continuing in more intractable conflict areas such as Palestine, Somalia, The Republic of Congo and North Korea.
There is no doubt that that we are witnessing the evolutionary genesis of globally mediated methods for permanently maintaining peace across the planet.

But it is now clear that most military analyses relating to the future of war are severely skewed and one dimensional, failing to adequately factor in drivers beyond traditional geopolitical pressures. These future drivers- primarily global warming, globalisation and cyber-culture are now approaching with the force of a tsunami and will overwhelm all other historical and traditional military drivers by mid-century.

Failing to adequately take their consequences into account is to blindside both history and future reality, with the potential to lead to further irrevocable impacts on a fragile world.

Globalisation involves the interweaving of the cultural, educational, legal, economic, political, and technological protocols of all nations in a dense web of dependencies and relationships. China and the US for example are now joined at the hip on trade and economic matters despite ideological disparities and are mutually interdependent. The US needs China’s financial reserves to prop up its massive dollar debt and as an export market, while China needs a strong US dollar to guarantee its investments and US markets for a large proportion of its exports. Although there are moves to disengage this will not happen in the foreseeable future.

These two superpowers are also indirectly connected by the web of alliance and trade networks within the international community as a whole. They are now both too big, too interconnected and too focussed on trying to improve the quality of life of their own populations to become involved in massively destructive global warfare.

The outstanding template for globalisation is of course the European Union, which now links the economies of 27 nations, that up until a century ago warred continuously, with massive loss of life and potential. Now their populations work together, trade together, marry together and share a common currency despite the current difficulties in the Eurozone. The EU is the third force in an increasingly multi-polar world, counterbalancing both the US and China. Emerging economic powerhouses such as Brazil, India, South Africa and Russia make up a fourth force, with other major regions such as the South East asian bloc also exerting an inceasingly powerful influence.

Globalisation is also being accelerated by the Cyber revolution- providing access by all populations to the world’s knowledge base and providing an unstoppable catalyst for democracy, despite short term futile attempts at national censorship. It now mediates civilisation’s social, scientific and commercial progress, with the potential to provide enormous computational and decision power for future global governance.

Simulated war-gaming, involving complex scenarios based on holistic social, cyber and economic factors, will therefore be increasingly applied to pre-evaluate the potential outcomes of waging war. The result will be that military imperatives will play a significantly reduced role in the future. This will be accelerated by the emerging dimensions of cyber and economic warfare, which within the next decade will overtake military systems capacity as key determinants in the geopolitical supremacy stakes.

Cyber warfare in particular will become increasingly common, used as a proxy for direct weapons-based assault. Recent major attacks on 3,000 major companies and Government institutions worldwide, demonstrate the potential for even small groups to wage global computer and economic warfare- cking and hijacking strategic planning data and shutting down critical control systems and infrastructure.

But global warming is the biggest challenge, with its impact the greatest potential threaT ever faced or likely to be faced by our civilisation. By the middle of this century the budgets of all countries, particularly those of the major and middle powers will be focussed on mitigating the massively destructive and disastrous outcomes including- increased frequency and severity of catastrophic events such as floods, droughts, blizzards and hurricanes resulting in massive damage to both the natural and engineered environment, acidification of oceans, loss of biodiversity, scarcity of food, water and energy, disease pandemics and unprecedented refugee flows.

The stresses on all societies will be enormous, but only through global cooperation will anarchy and conflict will be constrained. This will require planning and allocation of resources on a global scale. The budgets and assets of all major powers including the US, China, India and the EU will need to be synchronised and focussed on avoiding this over-riding threat to the future of humanity. National rivalries will be subsumed and military and weapons programs drastically cut.

A timeline on the evolution of this process is as follows-

By 2020- battlefield strategy will evolve towards one that is increasingly fought in covert form – not through the use of large-scale traditional weaponry as in previous wars, with conventional military values becoming obsolete. Most attacks will be focused on subduing increasingly integrated terrorist and criminal groups, military juntas and authoritarian regimes as well as legitimate minority ehtnic groups.

A high proportion of battlefield operations will be automated, with drones and robots operating remotely and eventually autonomously, using satellite and sensor surveillance and the latest Web based intelligence for decision support. Cyber and economic warfare will also play an increasing role, conducted both by governments and criminal and terrorist groups.

At the same time there will be greater emphasis on a variety of peace-keeping and mediation initiatives, involving a range of alliances between Governments, NGOs and military forces such as the new-look NATO, operating at the local level in cooperation with civilian populations. These strategies will increasingly be applied to support failing and dysfunctional states and establish democratic institutions in fragile states such as Iraq and Afghanistan where clumsy US policies have largely failed. This will become the primary template for future military operations.

By 2030- superpower states – US and China, will no longer able to sustain long term conflicts using 20th century arsenals of air, sea and land forces. The US will be forced to abdicate its traditional 20th century role of global military dominance as its resources become spread too thinly and it struggles to maintain quality of life for its population against unsustainable mounting levels of debt.

Similarly China, India and middle power nations will be forced to channel most of their resources to developing infrastructure, capacity and social services. Numerous flashpoints involving quelling local insurgencies and ethnic uprisings will remain. Increasingly the UN and representative government groups such as the present G20 will work together to minimise conflict globally. The EU will be seen as the template for global cooperation and peace-keeping will become the norm for conflict containment.

By 2040 – it is realised by most nations that conflict and wars are increasingly unsupportable on both moral and economic grounds. Globalisation wikk

ll continue to accelerate, with the creation of more complex networks of alliances and treaties binding nations and regional groups. At the same time countries will start to lose their traditional sovereign status, with pressure for more fluid cross border immigration relaxation and economicmanagement as in the EU. The mixing of races and nationalities will ease pressure for conflict, and provides greater accessibility to global health, education, and knowledge resources.
The reality of climate change, with its increasing frequency of disaster events, will force ideological disparities to play a secondary role.

By 2050- all available global resources will be marshalled to overcome the immense problems associated with global warming, with the end of wars between nations in sight.